The sequel.
The National (Scotland)Mark Blyth: Unionists 'taking my words on independence out of context'
An economics, investment, trading and policy blog with a focus on Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We seek the truth, avoid the mainstream and are virulently anti-neoliberalism.
The sequel.
The National (Scotland)Philip Pilkington turns the page on MMT?
https://twitter.com/philippilk/status/1772538175564447823
The US, like the UK, can’t go broke in their own currency. But if foreign lenders don’t buy into net bond issuance, USD will have to adjust to shrink the trade deficit. This will put upward pressure on inflation and is what the UK faced under Truss. Will Trump get Trussed?… pic.twitter.com/fDuYrC3Gzx
— Philip Pilkington (@philippilk) March 26, 2024
And there is indeed a ‘current account constraint’ – if you are a small open economy you need things you can sell in order to get the stuff you don’t have.MMT does recognize this constraint by treating it with more nuance.
MMT really applies, as many others suggest, uniquely to the US as it issues the world’s reserve currency.
If you are not the US and your Sovereign Currency is weak, it will drive import inflation so it really means that your currency is not properly sovereign.
- China introduced new guidelines to replace Intel, AMD chips and Microsoft Windows in government computers with domestic alternatives.
- The move is part of China's "xinchuang" strategy to achieve technological independence and reduce reliance on foreign technology.
- Analysts predict faster adoption of domestic server processors compared to PCs due to a less complex software ecosystem.
A brief note on the EU, Egypt, Palestine, and Copenhagen
MMT's man on the ground in the Global South.
Global South Perspectives—Reflections & Analysis by Fadhel KaboubInteresting post that deal with some of the same concepts as MMT but is not MMT. It's an interesting take. He has seen both sides, having grown up in a communist country (Yugoslavia). He is former hedge fund manager, commodities trader and author based in Monaco. He now blogs on geoeconomics and geopolitics at TrendCompass on Substack.
Alex Krainer's TrendCompassIn a keynote address to a conference on “Geopolitical Changes” at Kozminski University, Warsaw, on January 29, 2024, Professor James Galbraith called for economics to break with equilibrium dogma and re-found itself on the life principles that govern physics, biology and every existing mechanical and social system. Noting the distinguished presence of Professors Francis Fukuyama and E.S. Phelps, Galbraith called attention to the spectacular fallacies of “an end to history” and a “natural rate of unemployment,” arguing that these doctrines have helped blind our generation to the damage inflicted by rising resource costs and neoliberal policies of austerity and precarity, with dire consequences for households in wealthy societies, for their reproduction rates, and for the long-term viability of the species.
Transcript.
James K. Galbraith is an MMT-friendly economist.
Post-Neoliberalism—Pathways for Transformative Economics and PoliticsI have received several E-mails over the last few weeks that suggest that the economics discipline is finally changing course to redress the major flaws in the curricula that is taught around the world and that perhaps Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) can take some credit for some of that. There has been a tendency for some time for those who are attracted to MMT to become somewhat celebratory, even to the point of declaring ‘victory’. This tendency is not limited to the MMT public who comment on social media and the like. My response is that we are probably further away from seeing fundamental change in the economics profession than perhaps where we were some years ago – after the GFC and in the early years of the pandemic (which continues). My answer reflects the incontestable fact that the make up of faculties within our higher education systems has not changed much, if at all, and the dominant publishing and grant awarding bodies still reflect that mainstream dominance. There is still a lot of work to be done and a lot of ‘funerals’ to attend (à la Max Planck)....
Summary: Nothing is going to change while the same clique remains in power and controls the educational and publishing process. Same in politics, although it is much more difficult to control the narrative that serves as an instrument of control than the narrative in terms of which the public understands economics. Heterodox economics has a long way to go in disrupting and eventually replacing this "Econ 101" narrative that firmly rules the collective mindset.
There is much more in this post than the title and lede paragraph would suggest.
Here is an example.
[Angus] Deaton then admits that “I have recently found myself changing my mind, a discomfiting process for someone who has been a practicing economist for more than half a century.”
How so?
Well,
1. He now says that the dominance of the “virtues of free, competitive markets” has meant that mainstream economics has ignored corporate power.
He wrote: “Without an analysis of power, it is hard to understand inequality or much else in modern capitalism.”
That is, without beginning with class conflict, an analyst has zero chance of gaining an understanding of the dynamics of capitalism, where capital seeks to influence outcomes in any way that advances their cause to retain their hegemony.
But if we introduced that into economic analysis there would be no mainstream elements worth retaining.
The dominance unit of analysis in mainstream economics is the individual.
Society is not considered.
Collectives are not considered.
Conflict is played down.
And when power does come up in mainstream economics the focus has been of trade unions as perverting the free workings of the labour contracting process.
BRICS doubled its membership at the start of 2024, and faces huge tasks ahead: integrating its newest members, developing future admission criteria, deepening the institution's groundings, and most importantly, launching the mechanisms for bypassing the US dollar in international finance.
The financial plans are toward the end of the post. No details yet, but a plan is supposed to be presented at the BRICs meaning in the fall of this year. An alternative BRICs currency is not being planned at this stage when BRICs is just getting off the ground and has yet to be adequately institutionalized yet itself. It still just "a club" at this point. Lots of work to be done, especially with many more countries already lining up for membership.
The CradleJoseph Stiglitz makes freshman mistakes about MMT in addressing the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee on the sustainability of the UK’s national debt. Richard Murphy calls him out on it.
Important for MMT aficionado's.
I was asked during an interview the other day from Paris whether I was a Post Keynesian. I replied not at all and explained that I have never felt that my ideas fit into that category although in a facile sense we are all post keynesian in a temporal sense. Most progressive economists would answer yes if confronted with that question, even most of the economists involved in advancing Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). My point of departure is that while there was a lot of important analytical material in Keynes’ writing that is worth preserving and integrating into, say, MMT, where Keynes went astray was his antipathy to the insights provided by Karl Marx. In particular, I consider that Keynes seriously misunderstood what the dynamics of the class conflict were within a capitalist mode of production. Keynes made major errors in his predictions that one can directly attribute to this blinkered approach to capitalism. I was reminded of this when I read an Op Ed in the Japan Times this week (March 10, 2024) – The economic future of our overworked grandchildren. This blinkered approach, which has fed into the modern Post Keynesian literature – which examines capitalism as if it is an ahistorical, neutral system of production and distribution – is a major reason that I do not associate my work with that school of thought.
Failing to note the economic importance of class and class conflict is a foundational error.
"Class struggle" is foundational for Marx. Keynes knew this, of course. R. H. Tawney's Religion and the Rise of Capitalism was published in 1926. Keynes would have been aware of Weber and Tawney as well as Marx, all of whom viewed economic systems as historically determined socio-economic artifacts rather than natural systems. Keynes acknowledge this in calling economics a "moral science," which was also Adam Smith's view. The big three — Smith, Marx, and Keynes — were on the same page here.
Class is something that Keynes could not have missed being a member of the British upper class in a highly class-ridden society. Not only that the rise of Marxism in Russia and it's challenge to the West by socialists and communists in in the West had a particular salience at the time that Keynes was writing.
Did he miss the importance of class conflict to economics, or was he intentionally countering Marx in the West as the time that socialism was rising as an option to capitalism ("bourgeois liberalism").
In other words, was Keynes at apologist for capitalism that tried to put a better face on a fundamentally flawed socio-economic system by tweaking it.
Where Keynes came down on this is still debated, and there is wide disagreement about what role Keynes played and how he actually viewed it himself.
On the other hand, Keynes also was working in what he terms the "classical" paradigm prevalent at the time, which is now called "neoclassical." As Bill says, Keynes's "blinkered approach ... examines capitalism as if it is an ahistorical, neutral system of production and distribution."
Keynes seems to have had a foot in two boats. Bill claims that this results in major issues.
How does Bill's position affect MMT, as he admits that he difference from some other MMT economists on such issues.
William Mitchell — Modern Monetary Theory
LOL… Need a similar disclaimer when reporting on the debt doomsday morons who have been continuously wrong for 40 YEARS…
I find it hilarious that Bloomberg feels it necessary to include this disclaimer every time Kolanovic makes a market call. pic.twitter.com/sclIvqZm9V
— wu wei (@wu_wei_invest) March 12, 2024
The UK House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee is running an inquiry entitled “How sustainable is our National Debt?”
The GIMMS written evidence to the inquiry has now been published....
While this post is not MMT, it is consistent with MMT and implies that MMT is needed to address the issues that stem from wrong assumptions about the relationship of economics, finance, money and banking, as well as the mistaken view that money is neutral, being only a veil over what is at bottom a barter economy under the veneer of a monetary economy.
While MMT doesn't deal directly with the relationship of economics and power, being an institutional approach is incorporates the role of power implicitly in its analysis of the the relationship of economics and finance.
Much of what is presented as received economic wisdom about how economies work and the implications of policies is at best misleading and at worst simply wrong. For decades now, a significant and powerful lobby within the discipline has peddled half-truths and even falsehoods on many critical issues for example, how financial markets work and whether they can be “efficient” without regulation; the macroeconomic and distributive implications of fiscal policies; the impact of labor market and wage deregulation on employment and unemployment; how patterns of international trade and investment affect livelihoods and the possibility of economic diversification; how private investment responds to policy incentives such as tax breaks and subsidies and to fiscal deficits; how multinational investment and global value chains affect producers and consumers; the ecological damage wrought by patterns of production and consumption; whether tighter intellectual property rights are really necessary to promote invention and innovation; and so on.
Why does this happen? The original sin could be the exclusion of the concept of power from the discourse, which effectively reinforces existing power structures and imbalances. Underlying conditions are swept aside or covered up, such as the greater power of capital compared with workers; unsustainable exploitation of nature; differential treatment of workers through social labor market segmentation; the private abuse of market power and rent-seeking behavior; the use of political power to push private economic interests within and between nations; and the distributive impacts of fiscal ani.e. monetary policies.
The bloodiest period of Soviet totalitarianism ended in the fifties, but the habits remained long after, including the advanced system of alternative media that ultimately broke the state: samizdat.
Tonight, along with Stanford’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and New York Post reporter Miranda Devine, I’ll be accepting the inaugural Samizdat Prize, given by the RealClear Media Fund. Samizdat is a bit of a play on words, since like a lot of politically oppressive groups the Soviets had a mania for reducing beautiful language to state-acceptable ugly compound words (GosPlan, GULAG, etc.), so in place of GosIzdat (State-Publish, the official publisher) dissidents created Sam- or “Self” Izdat: “Self-Publish.”
Ten years ago PBS did a feature that quoted a Russian radio personality calling Samizdat the “precursor to the Internet.” Sadly this is no longer accurate….
The Committee for Economic Development (CED) of Conference Board recently put out “Explainer: The National Debt” which is pretty much a greatest hits of debt scare mongering. Other than the references to recent events and data, it is timeless: the authors could have put out the same report in any year since the mid-1980s and not much of the contents would have changed. Anyone who thinks that the MMT debate would improve things just needs to read the report to see that progress in conventional economics is largely illusionary.….
The spectacular government spending post-2008 and post-2020 appeared to upend the neoliberal logic of the past decades, enabling bold public action and opening the door to a more just and democratic social order. Specific policy choices stamped out this opportunity. These pivotal moments did, however, point to policy levers that can facilitate a breakthrough....Brave New Europe
Modern monetary theory has been influential in helping America rise out of the recession that crippled the economy during the pandemic, writes Professor Stephanie Kelton and Dr Steven Hail.
The overwhelming number of articles appearing attack MMT pretty much as the work of the devil. Regarding the the quote, "first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" (misattributed to Mahatma Gandhi), we seem to be at the attack stage.
Independent Australia
MMT sees America through rapid economic recoveryStephanie Kelton | Professor of Public Policy and Economics at Stony Brook University, formerly Democrats' chief economist on the staff of the U.S. Senate Budget Committee, and an economic adviser to the 2016 presidential campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders
Just three countries have so far introduced CBDCs, according to the IMF, and two of them are already having serious issues.Naked Capitalism
The roll-out of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), while still in its early stages, is not going as smoothly as the central banking community may have hoped. The latest central bank to admit to serious difficulties is the Bank of Jamaica (BOJ) whose governor Richard Byles has acknowledged that the rollout of the country’s CBDC, the Jam-Dex, has been a lot slower than originally anticipated. In fact, the total amount of Jam-Dex in circulation has remained stuck at just 230 million Jamaican dollars (USD 1.47 million) since the first — and so far only — batch of the digital currency was “minted” 19 months ago.
The Jam-Dex is one of just three fully-launched retail CBDCs in the world, according to the IMF, alongside the Bahamian sand dollar and Nigeria’s eNaira.
“Being one of the first in the world has its unique challenges,” Byles said at the BOJ’s quarterly monetary policy report press conference last Wednesday. “What we are finding in the roll-out is that as we address an issue and move ahead, another one pops up. I guess that’s what you get for being amongst the first; you don’t have a road map set out by others, but we are determined.”...
Biden still has a big “inflation!” political problem…. Story at National Pulse:
As the U.S. economy braces itself for the third year of an inflation surge that has substantially hiked the cost of living and sharply depressed real wages, most registered voters believe President Biden’s policies will cause prices to rise.
A poll by CBS News and YouGov released Sunday shows that 55 percent of registered voters believe Biden’s policies will trigger price increases.
Only 17 percent of registered voters believe his policies will cause prices to decline.
Twenty-seven percent believe his policies won’t impact prices either way, suggesting that 82 percent of voters believe Biden is ineffective at controlling inflation or is actively making it worse.
Voters Say Biden Will Make Inflation Worse, But He Says 'I'm Really Proud of My Record.'
— The National Pulse (@TheNatPulse) March 5, 2024
Read more:https://t.co/hBBMoSDSGN
As the U.S. economy braces itself for the third year of an inflation surge that has substantially...
Biden still using Larry Summers’ monetarist playbook to get himself out of his political problem:
Joe Biden's chief of staff says Biden is not isolated, and in fact regularly speaks with critics with such wide ranges of view as Larry Summers, Thomas Friedman and Mitch McConnell https://t.co/Aa2VLuqsYz by @EvanOsnosz pic.twitter.com/A9sIUQDwt6
— ☀️ Jon Schwarz ☀️ (@schwarz) March 4, 2024
Which will mean the continued regressive high interest rate policy during this election year…. Democrats sacrificing their political prospects on the alter of monetarism…
This week, the UK Chancellor releases the latest fiscal statement (aka ‘the budget’) and will also have a eye to the general election which must be held before January 28, 2025. One would expect the government would stall the announcement and delay the election for as long as is possible, given the current situation and the cumulative impacts of 12 years of Tory rule, which are plain to see at all levels of British society. All the talk is of tax cuts, that typical ‘sugar hit’ approach to winning votes that soon works it way out of the system. The debate as to what the British government should now be doing is clouded, as these debates are always clouded, by the input of organisations such as the Office of Budget Responsibility, which claims its charter is to “to examine and report on the sustainability of the public finances”, yet consistently provides input which is irrelevant to the substance of the issue and just feeds the flawed political scrum. In the end, the policy choices are not based on the actual opportunities and threats that are available to and confront the currency-issuing government but rather a fictional mindset that all the players are trapped within.William Mitchell — Modern Monetary Theory
Prince is ripping off my stuff! … I was saying this a week after the attack duh…. sheesh no brainer..
This article, which is favorable to MMT, contains a good explanation of what MMT is and isn't.
interest.co.nz[US] Conservatives, [El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele] said, “always tell me that the problem is high taxes, but they are wrong.”
“The real problem is that you pay high taxes only to uphold the illusion that you are funding the government, which you are not,” he claimed, before describing how the government is financed by Treasury bonds, which are purchased by the Federal Reserve with printed money backed by the bonds themselves.
“The government is funded by money printing, paper backed by paper. A bubble that will inevitably burst,” he said, adding that “the situation is even worse than it seems, because if most Americans and the rest of the world were to become aware of this farce, confidence in your currency would be lost. The dollar will fall, and Western civilization with it.”
“Oh sheeeeeeeeeeit!”…. 😂😂😂
Argentina’s economy contracted more than expected in December as newly elected President Milei put in motion shock austerity measures https://t.co/HHMFKEqo1v
— Bloomberg Economics (@economics) February 22, 2024
Last week (February 15, 2024), the Japanese Cabinet Office released the latest national accounts estimates for the December-quarter 2023 – Quarterly Estimates of GDP for Oct.-Dec. 2023 (The First preliminary) – which showed that the economy had slipped into an official recession (two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth) and in the process had moved from being the third largest economy in the world to become the fourth behind the US, China and Germany. According to the media release – 2023年10~12月期四半期別GDP速報 – the quarterly growth rate was -0.1 per cent (annual -0.4 per cent). Domestic demand was weak, contributing -0.3 per cent while net exports contributed +0.2 per cent. Part of the story is related to a ‘valuation drop’ because the yen has depreciated in recent months, undermining the value of exports and increasing the value of imports. But while there is some hysteria in the ‘markets’ and the mainstream economics commentary about the result, caution is required because the data will be revised (it was only preliminary) as more data comes in and it is highly possible for the negative to become a positive. But, I also take a different perspective on this from the dominant narrative in the media as you will see if you read on.
There is quite a deal of misunderstanding about the so-called ‘lost decade’ in Japan, following its dramatic real estate crash in the early 1990s.
The current narrative builds on those misunderstandings and constructs the GDP outcomes as if low growth is a problem.
If you look at the next graph you will start to get the point....